Explaining Myself.
The False Urgency of Combating Illegal Immigration
01/26/2026
So, now we're killing loud idealists, a predictable outcome of the Right's years-long drum beating over the woes of illegal immigration. They aren't just being killed - they are being recklessly killed if not murdered outright in skirmishes over quite literally - nothing.
Getting rid of illegals with such urgency was never important. The entire concept (of urgency) is purely a conservative/Trump campaign tagline. Five years after Trump and the clown team are gone, nobody is going to be talking about illegal immigration any more than they did for the first 200 plus years of the USA, outside little upticks here and there. These federal agents who pulled triggers and killed in the name of all this nonsense, even if they were "procedurally correct" - which is obviously debatable - are going to wake up one day with blood on their souls realizing it was all for nothing important. Feel for those officers as their mental and emotional fates are well in doom.
That doesn't mean illegal immigrants drawing on American resources isn't a problem or allowing anyone who beats the laws of the border should be allowed to live normally and comfortably without fear of consequence, is somehow "fine". Just that it was never exceptionally an issue while at the same time a tried-and-true tactic of scapegoating and distraction. If you view yourself as a political intellectual and fall for this, you should be ashamed.
As a matter of absolute certainty illegal immigration needs to be combat but with better and more uniform enforcement tactics that are quieter and in line with American values. Or, even if you disagree with a smarter more thoughtful approach, at least a loud theatrical one that meets the standard of Trumpism consisting of professional and well trained officers.
What other of Trump's own agenda items will he botch the execution of in the remaining years?
The Clown Team
Up until now I have been content to take the position that Democracy has spoken, to the extent that that actually exists here, so, shut up, promote the virtue of any alternative, and try harder next election. Trump won, deal with it, and let's get on. At least we have clarity, right?
Well - I'm not abandoning that position. But let me say this, they may be in charge and we do have to live with that, but that doesn't mean we have to respect them. Especially that god-awful Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem who has the audacity to comfortably tell the world that Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti, people daily and in principle doing more with their lives than she has the capacity for with her salon ding-dong eyelashes and confidence of ignorance, were terrorists. Talk about a glorified "TikTok influencer" who somehow "got lucky" with a title. I'd be curious about the real story behind that.
Normally when you go so far in life as to become part of the national Presidential team, that's something you can move forward with and be proud of. Partisan opinion notwithstanding, people get that you must be exceptional.
Not with Trump's though. Not the Clown Team. Anyone Trump has lined up will be regarded as jokes by default even with their current gigs on the resume.
You do NOT need to respect them.
By Dave for Personal Blog.
Comments (0) | Promote (0) | PermShare | Focuses (50)
Register to Comment
Trump Never Trumped Common Sense To Me
11/24/2024
Okay here is my analysis of the Trump win in the 2024 election.
1. Some of the Stuff You've Already Heard
I think the Democrats' inability to relate to the regular "working man", which includes effectively communicating Biden's economic successes; a longstanding track record for advocating for the normalizing of a role in society for people who literally sneak into the country to live here (in my view, if you do that and thrive that's a lucky break for you but you should always feel the pressure of being found out and deported -- not feel free to show up at the DMV looking for a driver's license - WTH?); and not re-shuffling the conversation about transgender and diversity to make sure that, while fighting the injustice of discrimination against alternative gender spectrum people, made sure that such battles were not above the issue of a 40 hour work week no longer solving a problem for anyone financially. On that latter point, I don't even think they were headlining any of that as an issue, but certainly they let the Trump campaign believe otherwise. So, yeah, pretty much any YouTube critique of what the dems did wrong, applies.
2. As Above, But With Stronger Emphasis On...
But then there is all of that political persecution that was so obviously designed to shoot Trump out of the picture permanently. They came to call it "Lawfare" and unfortunately it's apt. It's incredible how so many professionals in the justice system and in the media were unable to grasp how transparent it looked to dig up trivial matters of guilt and go non-stop in the media about what a "criminal" Trump was. Yes, they created a martyr and to some degree even terror. Is that what the justice system is for? -- controlling political candidates and election outcomes? Any idiot comes to learn, sooner or later, that wagon-fixing is common between conflicting parties, but holy cow, in the case of Trump Lavrentiy Beria would have been proud in the validation of his philosophy. People who by and large aren't idiots as a whole felt compelled to bite back. I am sure more than one independent looked at the endless legal bombing and said F that.
I am proud of this point because I saw it early on and tried to warn anyone with whom I so entered a political conversation. Prosecuting Trump for doing something that is likely routine among chummy loaners and their customers, making a huge show out of collecting boxes of mismanaged files, and not dropping the theory of a direct tie between Trump's intentions and will and those who vandalized and breached the White House on January 6, were all incredibly stupid.
3. The Strong Man Factor (Nobody is Talking About)
This particularly nauseating Mamala gush exchange did not dissuade the "strong man" motivated. I fear many votes were lost this moment.
And, I believe, apparently uniquely, that Trump also won due to the simple effect of a "strong man" attraction. Joe Rogan couldn't shake the stars out of his eyes after Trump sat down with him and felt proud to be key to a master that so endowed him with the attention. Not blaming Mr. Rogan because let's face it, most of us common folk, wouldn't be able to resist either. Rather, I'm pointing out the effect of a confident jerk that kept things narratively simple and digestible. Just because we don't have kings doesn't mean that the facade of one isn't all compelling. Civilizations have settled on royalty because there's something to it, and Trump kind of illustrates that. All manner and method of mental contortion were employed among many to mysteriously align their principles with the charismatic loudest voice in the room. If the contortion was too great to process, enough people just flew up their hands and concluded, for the light of Trump, they just wanted change.
The reality though is that they were just sucked and stuck into a charismatic vortex.
Let Me Explain My Position
I guess it's fair to explain my own opinion on Trump's win.
I didn't vote him I voted for Harris. Not that I was impressed with the Harris platform - such that it was - but because, as in 2020, I considered the Democratic candidate, in absence of a strong third party candidate, the best defense against someone wholly mentally and emotionally unqualified for the job, not wanting someone half-cocked with their finger on the nuclear button.
Consider, I even enjoy and appreciate some of the pro-Trump talking points to boot.
For example, he and his minions all hate the media, which in my own head, is part of a movement I've been massaging for at least a decade now (#deauthorizethemedia, right?)
And also, I can relate to feeling vulnerable to retaliatory "political smearing" and staging, having once taken a contrary position on a high profile matter, and worse, naively amplifying it, against an employer once. And similarily, politicians in the community at large who I was besmudging as a muckraking blogger at the time. Everyone had it out for me!
Point being though, I get that you never want to believe that actual grown adults in actual respectable positions of influence, would actually engage in dirty tactics, or be suspicious that they might, but it happens.
So Trump even has my sympathy on that.
Nor does the fact that I don't agree with the Democrats on some of their banner positions (I guess you can tell from above that I pretty much agree that illegal border crossing should be treated and coveted as something that is, well, illegal) sway me on the deeper doubt of Trump's qualification as a trustworthy national leader. Trump is a showman, a Biff-level capitalist who doesn't understand the entire point of human governance, and who has no business in any role coming even close, let alone that of the Presidency.
At best, I can resolve that at least we are definetely going to experience a change that may or may not lead to a better world, whether as a result of Trump's direct actions, or, the actions of decay, war, and tribulation that result from Trump.
Look at it this way, the world after Hitler was considered pretty good because it wasn't Hitler's.
So, there you have it. I don't want to end this on some high political or ideological lesson or preach of any sort -- this is me, as always, just explaining myself.
By Dave for Personal Blog.
deauthorizethemedia explanation politics
Comments (0) | Promote (0) | PermShare | Focuses (4323)
Register to Comment
